Essentially, yes
| The One Ring http://one-ring.co.uk/ |
|
| "Fluffy" http://one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=33255 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | stephen88 [ Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | "Fluffy" |
I've seen this word a few times used to describe armies. I cannot find an explanation for it anywhere! Can anyone explain what it means in reference to an army. Is it to do with the realism of an army/alliance in regards the books? |
|
| Author: | slinky [ Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Fluffy" |
Essentially, yes
|
|
| Author: | Hashut's Blessing [ Tue Sep 26, 2017 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Fluffy" |
Fluffy as opposed to hard. A hard list being something for trying to win a tournament as easily as possible. A fluffy army basically follows the lore of the world and is more focused on theme and style than strength of playability. Of course, you can have a fluffy army that you try to make as strong as possible, but that's a rough guide. |
|
| Author: | stephen88 [ Tue Sep 26, 2017 1:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Fluffy" |
Gotcha cheers! So a list made to be realistic instead of competitive. |
|
| Author: | LothÃriel [ Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Fluffy" |
You may sometimes seen it contrasted as fluff vs. crunch, with "crunch" being short for numbercrunching - trying to determine mathematically what the best army is for the points. Another opposite of "fluff" is sometimes called "cheese" or "beardy". |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|